Difference between revisions of "Electromagnetic Potentials"

Latest revision as of 18:55, 14 July 2017

The basic idea here is that the electromagnetic potentials [math]\varphi[/math] and [math]A[/math] may be the underlying key to several inventions related to electromagnetic forces.

1 Introduction
2 Novel Force laws proposed by various researchers
- 2.1 James Wesley's proposal
- 2.2 Cyril Smith's proposal
3 Explaining the Marinov Motor and Cyril Smith's "Marinov Generator" using Conventional Physics
4 A New Idea: The Makerarc
5 Explaining "Altered" Lenz' Law Devices
6 Explaining the Newman Motor
7 References
8 See also
9 Site map

Introduction

From December 2016 to March 2017, I (S.H.O. ^talk) have been conducting electromagnetic simulations using JavaScript and the THREE.js script library (http://threejs.org). Based on these results, I have determined that the magnetic component of the Lorentz force:

causes transfers of energy within the magnetic rotor assembly (such as electron kinetic energy and inductive storage energy into wire kinetic energy (wired rotor example), or atomic electron kinetic energy to magnetic domain kinetic energy (permanent magnet rotor example)) that, in the low-frequency approximation, pretty much matches the amount of energy transfer between fields and the driving (stator) coils which is due to the transformer induction electric field acting on currents in the coils from the relative motion of the magnetic rotor assembly.

As a result, the only way using conventional physics to explain various devices, such as the Marinov Motor^[1], the Distinti Paradox2^[2], and, especially, the Marinov Generator^[3]^[4] is to more accurately define the electric field [math]\mathbf{E}[/math], which is part of the full Lorentz Force equation, and then see if it leads to predictions that confirm observations, especially those found figure 9 of Cyril Smith's 2009 paper on the "Marinov Generator".^[4] S.H.O. ^talk 22:09, 5 March 2017 (PST)

Prior content in the "Comment Record" section:

Prior content in the "Background" section:

http://www.sho.wiki/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Potentials&diff=next&oldid=1162

Novel Force laws proposed by various researchers

James Wesley's proposal

James Wesley proposed adding the "motional induction" on charge q. In SI Units, this can be expressed as:^[1]

to the Lorentz force.

The idea behind this was to explain an observation in an experiment involving a "Marinov Motor"^[1] in which longitudinal induction forces were produced.

The extra term is equivalent to:^[5]

Where [math]\mathbf{v}[/math] is the velocity of the charge.

The Lorentz force is:

Therefore, adding the extra term proposed by Wesley results in:

The problem with this modification:

In the case of an electrical charge approaching a wire, this additional term proposed by Wesley would double the force of deflection. This is not observed.

Consider the vector potential due a current-carrying wire on the x-axis. Both the current and the vector potential of this current point in the [math]+x[/math] direction. Now have a charge approaching this wire perpendicularly. Both the magnetic Lorentz force and the additional Wesley term predict the same force. The proposed additional term is superfluous and would double the force of deflection if added.

Cyril Smith's proposal

Cyril Smith proposed adding the following gradient to the Lorentz force:^[3]

This is equal to:

The idea behind this was to explain an observation in an experiment involving a "Marinov Generator"^[3] in which longitudinal induction forces were produced.

The Lorentz force is:

Therefore, adding the extra term proposed by Cyril Smith results in:

The problem with this modification:

In the case of two parallel current-carrying wires, this additional term proposed by Cyril Smith negates the magnetic forces between the currents. It turns out that the extra term may yield forces perpendicular to the velocity. The relevant field components are:

Explaining the Marinov Motor and Cyril Smith's "Marinov Generator" using Conventional Physics


See the online bulletin thread titled "Electromagnetism and relativity" for details on this video^[6].

The Liénard–Wiechert electric field was derived from the Liénard–Wiechert potentials [math]\varphi[/math] and [math]A[/math]^[7]^[8] by Kirk T. McDonald^[9], Professor Emeritus of Princeton University in New Jersey^[10].

In the sub-sections below, Gaussian units are used unless otherwise noted. Also, do note that all electric fields due to source charges are, in the following sub-sections, evaluated in the rest frame of each target charge subject to them separately. This procedure has roots in an approach to electromagnetism introduced by Edward M. Purcell^[11] in Section 5.6 of the Berkeley Physics Course (Volume II) titled Electricity and Magnetism^[12]^[13] and is explained by a video by Veritasium titled "How Special Relativity Makes Magnets Work"^[14]. This avoids having to perform calculations based on the magnetic field viewed by an arbitrary inertial observer. This procedure relies on the relative velocities between the charges. The calculations in the sub-sections below are valid for [math]v \ll c[/math].

The Liénard–Wiechert electric fields for electrically-neutral currents

From the paper titled "Onoochin's Paradox" by Kirk T. McDonald^[15]^[16], we have following statement:

For calculations of the Lorentz force to be accurate to order [math]\frac{1}{c^2}[/math], it suffices to use eq. (4) for the magnetic field. However, to maintain the desired accuracy the electric field of a moving charge must also include effects of retardation, as can be obtained from an expansion of the Liénard–Wiechert fields ^[7]^[8] (for details, see the appendix of ^[9]),
where [math]\mathbf{a}[/math] is the acceleration [math]\mathbf{a}[/math] of the charge [math]q[/math] at the present time.

Let's consider the situation where the acceleration [math]\mathbf{a}[/math] of charge [math]q[/math] is negligible. The electric field at [math]\mathbf{r}[/math] due to source charge [math]q[/math] located at the origin is:

In the Coulomb gauge, the first term in the parentheses comes from the electric scalar potential of a charge at rest in the observer's inertial frame. In event that the charge is contained within an electrically-neutral body, the electric field reduces to:

Let's consider a target charge [math]Q[/math] located at [math]\mathbf{r}[/math] at rest in the observer's inertial frame. The inertial observer and the charge [math]q[/math] agree on what the electric field [math]\mathbf{E}[/math] is, they agree that there is no magnetic force on [math]Q[/math], and finally, they agree on the acceleration of [math]Q[/math].

Another way to express this result is in terms of the angle [math]\theta[/math] between [math]\mathbf{v}[/math] and [math]\mathbf{r}[/math]:

The above equation can be broken up into two parts, one based on the relative azimuthal velocity [math]\mathbf{v}_{\theta}[/math] of the source, and one based on the relative radial velocity [math]\mathbf{v}_r[/math] of the source. First we rearrange the equation:

Since the relative azimuthal velocity and the relative radial velocity are orthogonal, we can express the following:

The relative azimuthal velocity can be split into orthogonal components in [math]x[/math] and [math]y[/math] according to the following Pythagorean relation:

Therefore:

The variables [math]v_x[/math], [math]v_y[/math], and [math]v_r[/math] are mutually independent from each other. Therefore, the electric field [math]\mathbf{E}[/math] can be split into three co-radial contributions:

Consider the existence of four charges:

: the negative charge of loose electrons of the source current element

: the negative charge of loose electrons of the target current element

: the positive charge of metallic atoms (excluding loose electrons) of the source current element

: the positive charge of metallic atoms (excluding loose electrons) of the target current element

Consider the existence of their corresponding current elements:

: the source current element

: the target current element

Where:

is the source current and is its length element.

is the target current and is its length element.

The current elements are equal to:

Where:

is the drift velocity of the electrons of the source current element.

is the drift velocity of the electrons of the target current element.

Say we want to calculate the force on the target current element due to the source current element. This requires us to analyze four different forces:

Force on by field of

These four forces are dependent on four different relative velocities (source velocity w.r.t. target velocity):

Relative velocity

The corresponding relative speeds are:

Relative speed

The two drift velocities are:

: The drift velocity of the loose electrons of the source current element

: The drift velocity of the loose electrons of the target current element

Let the effective velocities of the current elements be:

So the effective relative velocity between the current elements (source velocity w.r.t. target velocity) is:

The effective velocity of each current element is halfway between the velocity of the negative charges and the velocity of the positive charges, so one may rather define a new variable, the deviation velocity, to be one-half the drift velocity of the electrons:

is the deviation velocity of the source current element.

is the deviation velocity of the target current element.

All four relative velocities can be expressed in terms of the deviation velocities [math]\mathbf{u}[/math] and [math]\mathbf{U}[/math] together with the relative velocity [math]\mathbf{v}_{rel}[/math].

Relative velocity

The corresponding relative speeds are:

Relative speed

The equation for the electric field contains squared values of the speed. As noted before:

The electric fields on charges [math]Q_+[/math] and [math]Q_-[/math], in their own respective and distinct rest frames, are as follows:

The Forces due to the Liénard–Wiechert electric fields for electrically-neutral currents

It may be more helpful to calculate the forces due to relative radial velocities separately from the forces due to relative azimuthal velocities. Therefore:

It follows that [math]\mathbf{F}_x[/math] and [math]\mathbf{F}_y[/math] are functions of currents perpendicular to radial vector [math]\mathbf{r}[/math] while [math]\mathbf{F}_r[/math] is a function of currents co-linear with radial vector [math]\mathbf{r}[/math]

All charges ([math]Q_-[/math], [math]Q_+[/math], [math]q_-[/math], and [math]q_+[/math]) may contribute simultaneously to the azimuthally-directed (transverse) currents in [math]x[/math] and [math]y[/math] and the radially-directed (longitudinal) currents in [math]r[/math].

It will be very advantageous to simplify these formulas. For electrically-neutral currents, we can recognize the following:

This allows us to factor out [math]Q_+ q_+[/math] with the following result:

Next, we will work on simplifying the contents within the parentheses. To make matters simpler, we will move the subscript to the lower right corner of the parentheses.

These can be distributed back to the contents within the parentheses after they are substituted for a different expression in terms of the currents. The terms in the parentheses (disregarding their sign) are as follows:

Therefore sum of the forces on [math]Q_-[/math] and [math]Q_+[/math] depends on:

The force on [math]Q_-[/math] depends on:

The force on [math]Q_+[/math] depends on:

Recalling that:

Substitution yields:

Simplified:

As stated earlier, the current elements are equal to:

We can now substitute the currents into the equation. First we substitute [math]Q_- q_-[/math] for [math]Q_+ q_+[/math]:

Next, we assign each charge with their corresponding drift velocities:

Next, we make a substitution for the current elements:

This can be written as:

Or:

Adding the forces together, their sum is:

In S.I. Units:

Or:

The second differential is:

Special Scenario: No relative motion between positive charges

In the case that the positive charges [math]q_+[/math] and [math]Q_+[/math] are essentially stationary, we can simplify the derivation of the field and force equations in the rest frame of the positive charges.

As stated in the parent section, the two drift velocities are:

: The drift velocity of the loose electrons of the source current element

: The drift velocity of the loose electrons of the target current element

These become:

: The drift velocity of the loose electrons of the source current element

: The drift velocity of the loose electrons of the target current element

As stated in the parent section, the effective velocities of the current elements are:

These become:

As stated in the parent section, a new variable, the deviation velocity, is defined as one-half the drift velocity of the electrons:

is the deviation velocity of the source current element.

is the deviation velocity of the target current element.

Therefore:

The effective relative velocity between the current elements (source velocity w.r.t. target velocity) is:

Therefore:

As derived in the parent section, all four relative velocities can be expressed in terms of the deviation velocities [math]\mathbf{u}[/math] and [math]\mathbf{U}[/math] together with the relative velocity [math]\mathbf{v}_{rel}[/math].

Relative velocity

By substituting for [math]\mathbf{v}_{rel}[/math], we get:

Relative velocity

As derived in the parent section, the following is a series sum of terms (a function of relative speeds) which will be used to help calculate the forces between currents:

Based on the above results, we have:

This produces the same results as the parent section titled "Explaining the Marinov Motor and Cyril Smith's 'Marinov Generator' using Conventional Physics" and the previous section titled "The Forces due to the Liénard–Wiechert electric fields for electrically-neutral currents":

In S.I. Units:

Or:

The second differential is:

Deriving James Wesley's additional force term in the case of co-linear current elements

As pointed out above in the sub-section titled "James Wesley's proposal", James Wesley proposed adding the "motional induction" on charge [math]q[/math]. In SI Units, this can be expressed as:^[1]

How may we derive the same result for current elements located and oriented along the same line? Equation 2b of the paper titled "Observations of the Marinov Motor"^[1] can be adapted to the form above, resulting in:

In the case that we are dealing only with co-linear current elements, the result can be expressed as:

As stated in the parent section, the force on [math]Q_-[/math] depends on:

As stated in the parent section, The force on [math]Q_+[/math] depends on:

In the case that that there is no relative velocity [math]v_{rel}[/math] between the current elements:

As stated in the section "The Forces due to the Liénard–Wiechert electric fields for electrically-neutral currents", the electric forces on charges [math]Q_-[/math] and [math]Q_+[/math] are:

From this and above, it follows that:

Therefore:

The effective electric fields experience by each charge is:

Given that:

It can be shown that:

This is based on the directional derivative of vector potential [math]\mathbf{A}[/math] along [math]Id\mathbf{L}[/math].

It is important to note that the total force [math]\mathbf{F}_r[/math] in [math]r[/math] remains unaffected by the relative motion between the target current element [math]I_rd\mathbf{L}_r[/math] and the source current element [math]i_rd\mathbf{l}_r[/math] responsible for vector potential [math]\mathbf{A}_r[/math]. However, forces [math]\mathbf{F}_{r-}[/math] and [math]\mathbf{F}_{r+}[/math] are affected by the relative speed [math](v_{rel})_r[/math] between the current elements in [math]r[/math], which leads to a kind of electromagnetic induction acting between co-linear current elements in relative motion in [math]r[/math]. This feature may help to explain Cyril Smith's "Marinov Generator"^[3].

A New Idea: The Makerarc

The above result supports a development beyond the S.H.O. Drive. A much more powerful and compact permanent magnet system is now envisioned.

The preliminary name is Makerarc (MAY-KERR-ARK), which stands for:

Magnetic
Atom
Kinetic
Energy
Reservoir
And
Resource
Channel

Details pending. Stay tuned. Sincerely, S.H.O. ^talk 22:09, 5 March 2017 (PST)

What makes a magnet tick? Clues can be found in the video titled "MAGNETS: How Do They Work?" by Veritasium^[17]. S.H.O. ^talk 22:08, 23 March 2017 (PDT)

An attempt to produce the Makerarc back in March 2017^[18] failed to demonstrate the predictions of the term ^[19] where I assumed that an external vector potential [math]\mathbf{A}[/math] would lead to a force co-linear to current elements. This may be due to the supercurrent nature of electrons bounded to atoms, allowing atoms to be capable of preserving or "fixing" the amount of magnetic flux that passes through them, just as "macroscopic" superconducting currents do for superconductors, and therefore, by extension be capable of resisting changes in the magnetic vector potential. This does not negate the possibility of a Marinov Generator, as designed by Cyril Smith, because in his case the currents receiving power were inside a conductor where an externally applied vector potential is not fully shielded against, permitting to yield a force. At the moment, I am still trying to decide on the correct model, but hopefully the surviving concept is similar to what I have developed so far in this page. Sincerely, S.H.O. ^talk 19:55, 14 July 2017 (PDT)

Explaining "Altered" Lenz' Law Devices

It is anticipated that the longitudinal force described above in the section titled "Explaining the Marinov Motor and Cyril Smith's 'Marinov Generator' using Conventional Physics" may explain some types of purported Reduced-Lenz devices. A good example can be found in the video below ("Ray's No Back EMF Generator"), although in this example, the longitudinal force increases the drag, mainly in positions where pancake generator coil is mostly outside the cylindrical boundary of the permanent magnet. This creates an illusion of a "Reduced" Lenz' Law effect when the magnet is mostly within the cylindrical boundary of the permanent magnet:

Simulations in JavaScript and THREE.js have determined that in many other configurations of currents and magnets, the magnetic Lorentz forces will be opposed in part by the additional force. This makes certain types of magnetic circuit arrangements more efficient at electrical power generation (in terms of output power vs. input power) but less efficient as an electrical motor. Simulations of the S.H.O. Drive indicated that the additional force may vary between assisting or opposing the magnetic Lorentz force, which is helpful depending on whether the goal is to develop an efficient motor or an efficient generator, respectively. The simulated S.H.O. Drive designs appeared to switch between these two extremes every quarter cycle. The only way to make it work would have been to increase the inductive reactance (so that the current would be delayed by about a quarter cycle), and even then, simulations indicated that the extra term was typically insufficient to completely reverse the net force. However simulations of various rotor and S.H.O. coil curve modifications for the S.H.O. Drive showed that it was possible for the additional force to be a significant percentage of the magnetic Lorentz force. Per more recent simulations (early March), the Makerarc design (previous section) will improve upon this many fold. S.H.O. ^talk 23:39, 5 March 2017 (PST)

Explaining the Newman Motor

See also: Memory Lane

A Newman Motor-style coil and magnet arrangement, like that shown in the video below, have been simulated by me using JavaScript and THREE.js.

The extra electric field term predicts a significant opposition to the magnetic Lorentz force at angles slightly straying from the "top-dead-vertical" position, making it a better generator than a motor. However, when energy is discharged from the "generator coil" to the "motor coil" of Newman's motor, the rotor will have often changed position to the point where the magnetic Lorentz force becomes increasingly significant, helpful for motive purposes. Newman's motor operated at a high Q, which facilitated energy recovery. S.H.O. ^talk 00:00, 6 March 2017 (PST)

References

Site map

HQ ● Glossary ● April 2016 Presentation

Replication Station

Function Conjunction
- Magnetic Energy
- The Anatomy of a Physical Expression
- Functions composed of Physical Expressions
- Electromagnetic Potentials

Frontier Fork

Reading Railroad

Media Avenue
- 2015: Dec
- 2016: Jan Feb Mar May Jun Aug Dec
- 2017: Jan

Memory Lane
- YouTube: '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16

Precession Circle

Script Strip

[Marinov_Motor-1] 1.0 ^1.1 ^1.2 ^1.3 ^1.4 http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/Pre2001/V05NO3PDF/v05n3phi.pdf

[2] ttp://www.distinti.com/docs/pdx/paradox2.pdf

[Marinov_Generator-3] 3.0 ^3.1 ^3.2 ^3.3 http://overunity.com/14691/the-marinov-generator/

[Marinov_Generator_.28paper.29-4] 4.0 ^4.1 http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=2470.0;attach=13897

[5] ttp://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=2470.0;attach=13908

[6] ttps://www.physicsforums.com/threads/electromagnetism-and-relativity.747811/

[Li.C3.A9nard-7] 7.0 ^7.1 https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B817m31MAj0wZTZjZmMwMjgtY2Y5YS00YTQ5LThjM2EtNzhjYTYzNzFlZDY0/edit?hl=en_GB&pli=1

[Wiechert-8] 8.0 ^8.1 https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B817m31MAj0wMDI1YjllYjctY2NhOS00M2M2LWFlMTUtYjVmYTkyZmVlY2M2/edit?hl=en_GB

[McDonald_notes-9] 9.0 ^9.1 http://web.archive.org/web/20170318210550/http://puhep1.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/ph501/ph501lecture24.pdf

[10] ttps://dof.princeton.edu/about/clerk-faculty/emeritus/kirk-t-mcdonald

[11] ttp://physics.weber.edu/schroeder/mrr/mrrtalk.html

[12] ttps://www.scribd.com/doc/128728926/Electricity-and-Magnetism-Berkeley-Physics-Course-Purcell

[13] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_Physics_Course

[Veritasium-14] ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TKSfAkWWN0

[McDonald-15] ttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.299.8534

[16] ttp://freeweb.siol.net/markoor/onoochin.pdf

[17] ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFAOXdXZ5TM

[18] ttps://www.facebook.com/Sho.Drives/videos/790278744462849/

[19] ttps://www.facebook.com/Sho.Drives/videos/791514291005961/

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

Difference between revisions of "Electromagnetic Potentials"

Latest revision as of 18:55, 14 July 2017

Contents

Introduction

Novel Force laws proposed by various researchers

James Wesley's proposal

Cyril Smith's proposal

Explaining the Marinov Motor and Cyril Smith's "Marinov Generator" using Conventional Physics

The Liénard–Wiechert electric fields for electrically-neutral currents

The Forces due to the Liénard–Wiechert electric fields for electrically-neutral currents

Special Scenario: No relative motion between positive charges

Deriving James Wesley's additional force term in the case of co-linear current elements

A New Idea: The Makerarc

Explaining "Altered" Lenz' Law Devices

Explaining the Newman Motor

References

See also

Site map

Navigation menu

Personal tools

S.H.O.

Namespaces

Variants

Views

Actions

Search

Navigation

Tools

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 causes transfers of energy ''within'' the magnetic rotor assembly (such as electron kinetic energy and inductive storage energy into wire kinetic energy (wired rotor example), or atomic electron kinetic energy to magnetic domain kinetic energy (permanent magnet rotor example)) that, in the low-frequency approximation, pretty much matches the amount of energy transfer between fields and the driving (stator) coils which is due to the transformer induction electric field <math>- \frac{\partial \mathbf{A}}{\partial t}</math> acting on currents in the coils from the relative motion of the magnetic rotor assembly.
-As a result, the only way using conventional physics to explain various devices, such as the Marinov Motor<ref>http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/Pre2001/V05NO3PDF/v05n3phi.pdf</ref>, the Distinti Paradox2<ref>http://www.distinti.com/docs/pdx/paradox2.pdf</ref>, and, especially, the Marinov Generator<ref name="Marinov Generator">http://overunity.com/14691/the-marinov-generator/</ref><ref name="Marinov Generator (paper)">http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=2470.0;attach=13897</ref> is to more accurately define the electric field <math>\mathbf{E}</math>, which is part of the full Lorentz Force equation, and then see if it leads to predictions that confirm observations, especially those found figure 9 of Cyril Smith's 2009 paper on the "Marinov Generator".<ref name="Marinov Generator (paper)"/> ''[[User:S.H.O.|S.H.O.]] <sup>[[User_talk:S.H.O.|talk]]</sup>'' 22:09, 5 March 2017 (PST)
+As a result, the only way using conventional physics to explain various devices, such as the Marinov Motor<ref name="Marinov Motor">http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/Pre2001/V05NO3PDF/v05n3phi.pdf</ref>, the Distinti Paradox2<ref>http://www.distinti.com/docs/pdx/paradox2.pdf</ref>, and, especially, the Marinov Generator<ref name="Marinov Generator">http://overunity.com/14691/the-marinov-generator/</ref><ref name="Marinov Generator (paper)">http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=2470.0;attach=13897</ref> is to more accurately define the electric field <math>\mathbf{E}</math>, which is part of the full Lorentz Force equation, and then see if it leads to predictions that confirm observations, especially those found figure 9 of Cyril Smith's 2009 paper on the "Marinov Generator".<ref name="Marinov Generator (paper)"/> ''[[User:S.H.O.|S.H.O.]] <sup>[[User_talk:S.H.O.|talk]]</sup>'' 22:09, 5 March 2017 (PST)
 '''Prior content in the "Comment Record" section:'''
@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 ==Novel Force laws proposed by various researchers==
-===Stefan Marinov's proposal===
+===James Wesley's proposal===
-Stefan Marinov proposed adding the "motional-transformer induction" on charge q:<ref>https://archive.org/stream/thornywayoftruthpart4maririch#page/104/mode/2up/search/motional-transformer+induction</ref>
+James Wesley proposed adding the "motional induction" on charge q. In SI Units, this can be expressed as:<ref name="Marinov Motor"/>
-: <math>(\mathbf{v_{wire}}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{A}</math>
+: <math>-q(\mathbf{v}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{A}</math>
-or rather:
+to the Lorentz force.
-: <math>-(\mathbf{v_{charge}}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{A}</math>
+The idea behind this was to explain an observation in an experiment involving a "Marinov Motor"<ref name="Marinov Motor"/> in which longitudinal induction forces were produced.
-to the Lorentz force.
 The extra term is equivalent to:<ref>http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=2470.0;attach=13908</ref>
@@ Line 55: / Line 53: @@
 <math>\mathbf{F} = q\left[-\nabla \varphi- \frac{\partial \mathbf{A}}{\partial t}+ \nabla_\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{v}\cdot\mathbf{A})-(\mathbf{v}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{A} \right]</math>
-Therefore, adding the extra term proposed by Stefan Marinov results in:
+Therefore, adding the extra term proposed by Wesley results in:
 <math>\mathbf{F} = q\left[-\nabla \varphi- \frac{\partial \mathbf{A}}{\partial t}+ \nabla_\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{v}\cdot\mathbf{A})-2(\mathbf{v}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{A} \right]</math>
@@ Line 61: / Line 59: @@
 The problem with this modification:
-In the case of an electrical charge approaching a wire, this additional term proposed by Marinov '''doubles''' the force of deflection. This is not observed.
+In the case of an electrical charge approaching a wire, this additional term proposed by Wesley would '''double''' the force of deflection. This is not observed.
-Consider the vector potential due a current-carrying wire on the x-axis. Both the current and the vector potential of this current point in the +x direction. Now have a charge approaching this wire perpendicularly. Both the magnetic Lorentz force and the additional Marinov term predict the same force.
+Consider the vector potential due a current-carrying wire on the x-axis. Both the current and the vector potential of this current point in the <math>+x</math> direction. Now have a charge approaching this wire perpendicularly. Both the magnetic Lorentz force and the additional Wesley term predict the same force. The proposed additional term is superfluous and would double the force of deflection if added.
-Now consider the case where the wire is moving toward the charge. In this case, both the transformer induction <math>- \frac{\partial \mathbf{A}}{\partial t}</math> and the additional Marinov term predict the same force acting on the charge directed parallel to the vector potential of the current. The term proposed by Marinov '''doubles''' the observed force in these cases.
 ===Cyril Smith's proposal===
@@ Line 103: / Line 99: @@
 ==Explaining the Marinov Motor and Cyril Smith's "Marinov Generator" using Conventional Physics==
-===The Longitudinal E-field derived from the Liénard–Wiechert Potentials===
+{| class=wikitable width=200 style="float: right"
+|-
+|<youtube>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TKSfAkWWN0</youtube>
+|-
+|
+See the online bulletin thread titled "Electromagnetism and relativity" for details on this video<ref>https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/electromagnetism-and-relativity.747811/</ref>.
+|}
-Believe it or not, the electromagnetic potentials formulated independently by Alfred-Marie Liénard<ref>https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B817m31MAj0wZTZjZmMwMjgtY2Y5YS00YTQ5LThjM2EtNzhjYTYzNzFlZDY0/edit?hl=en_GB&pli=1</ref> and Emil Wiechert<ref>https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B817m31MAj0wMDI1YjllYjctY2NhOS00M2M2LWFlMTUtYjVmYTkyZmVlY2M2/edit?hl=en_GB</ref> anticipate an electric field with longitudinal components.
+The Liénard–Wiechert electric field was derived from the Liénard–Wiechert potentials <math>\varphi</math> and <math>A</math><ref name="Liénard"/><ref name="Wiechert"/> by Kirk T. McDonald<ref name="McDonald notes"/>, Professor Emeritus of Princeton University in New Jersey<ref>https://dof.princeton.edu/about/clerk-faculty/emeritus/kirk-t-mcdonald</ref>.
-The Liénard–Wiechert potentials <math>\varphi</math> (scalar potential field) and <math>\mathbf{A}</math> (vector potential field) are for a ''source point'' charge <math>q_s</math> at position <math>\mathbf{r}_s</math> traveling with velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_s</math>:
+In the sub-sections below, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_units Gaussian units] are used unless otherwise noted. Also, do note that all electric fields due to '''''source charges''''' are, in the following sub-sections, evaluated in the <u>'''rest frame'''</u> of '''<u>each</u> ''target charge''''' subject to them <u>'''separately'''</u>. This procedure has roots in an approach to electromagnetism introduced by Edward M. Purcell<ref>http://physics.weber.edu/schroeder/mrr/mrrtalk.html</ref> in Section 5.6 of the Berkeley Physics Course (Volume II) titled ''Electricity and Magnetism''<ref>https://www.scribd.com/doc/128728926/Electricity-and-Magnetism-Berkeley-Physics-Course-Purcell</ref><ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_Physics_Course</ref> and is explained by a video by Veritasium titled "How Special Relativity Makes Magnets Work"<ref name="Veritasium">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TKSfAkWWN0</ref>. This avoids having to perform calculations based on the magnetic field viewed by an arbitrary inertial observer. This procedure relies on the relative velocities between the charges. The calculations in the sub-sections below are valid for <math>v \ll c</math>.
-:<math>\varphi(\mathbf{r}, t) = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \left(\frac{q_s}{(1 - \mathbf{n} \cdot \boldsymbol{\beta}_s)|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|} \right)_{t_r}</math>
+===The Liénard–Wiechert electric fields for electrically-neutral currents===
-and
+From the paper titled "Onoochin's Paradox" by Kirk T. McDonald<ref name="McDonald">http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.299.8534</ref><ref>http://freeweb.siol.net/markoor/onoochin.pdf</ref>, we have following statement:
-:<math>\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t) = \frac{\mu_0c}{4 \pi} \left(\frac{q_s \boldsymbol{\beta}_s}{(1 - \mathbf{n} \cdot \boldsymbol{\beta}_s)|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|} \right)_{t_r} = \frac{\boldsymbol{\beta}_s(t_r)}{c} \varphi(\mathbf{r}, t)</math>
+<blockquote>''For calculations of the Lorentz force to be accurate to order <math>\frac{1}{c^2}</math>, it suffices to use eq. (4) for the magnetic field. However, to maintain the desired accuracy the electric field of a moving charge must also include effects of retardation, as can be obtained from an expansion of the Liénard–Wiechert fields <ref name="Liénard">https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B817m31MAj0wZTZjZmMwMjgtY2Y5YS00YTQ5LThjM2EtNzhjYTYzNzFlZDY0/edit?hl=en_GB&pli=1</ref><ref name="Wiechert">https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B817m31MAj0wMDI1YjllYjctY2NhOS00M2M2LWFlMTUtYjVmYTkyZmVlY2M2/edit?hl=en_GB</ref> (for details, see the appendix of <ref name="McDonald notes">http://web.archive.org/web/20170318210550/http://puhep1.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/ph501/ph501lecture24.pdf</ref>),
-where <math>\boldsymbol{\beta}_s(t) = \frac{\mathbf{v}_s(t)}{c}</math> and  <math>\mathbf{n} = \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|}</math>.
+:<math>\mathbf{E} \approx q\ \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \left(1 + \frac{v^2}{2c^2} - 3\frac{\left(\mathbf{\hat{r}} \cdot \mathbf{v}\right)^2}{2c^2} \right) - \frac{q}{2c^2r}\left[\mathbf{a}+\left(\mathbf{a} \cdot \mathbf{\hat{r}} \right)\mathbf{\hat{r}}\right]</math>
-The electric field derived from this is:
+''where <math>\mathbf{a}</math> is the acceleration <math>\mathbf{a}</math> of the charge <math>q</math> at the present time.</blockquote>
-:<math>\begin{align}\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \frac{q_s}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|^2(1 - \mathbf{n} \cdot {\boldsymbol \beta}_s)^3} \left[\left(\mathbf{n} - {\boldsymbol \beta}_s\right)(1-{\beta_s}^2) + |\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|(\mathbf{n} \cdot \dot{\boldsymbol \beta}_s/c) (\mathbf{n} - {\boldsymbol \beta}_s) - |\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|\big(\mathbf{n} \cdot (\mathbf{n} - {\boldsymbol \beta}_s)\big) \dot{\boldsymbol \beta}_s/c \right]\end{align}</math>
+Let's consider the situation  where the acceleration <math>\mathbf{a}</math> of charge <math>q</math> is negligible. The electric field at <math>\mathbf{r}</math> due to '''''source charge''''' <math>q</math> located at the origin is:
-which is equal to <math>-{\boldsymbol \nabla}\varphi - \frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt}</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{E} = q\ \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \left(1 + \frac{v^2}{2c^2} - 3\frac{\left(\mathbf{\hat{r}} \cdot \mathbf{v}\right)^2}{2c^2} \right)</math>
-If acceleration <math>\dot{\boldsymbol \beta}_s</math> is negligible, then we have:
+In the Coulomb gauge, the first term in the parentheses comes from the electric scalar potential of a charge at rest in the observer's inertial frame. In event that the charge is contained within an electrically-neutral body, the electric field reduces to:
-:<math>\begin{align}\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \frac{q_s}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|^2(1 - \mathbf{n} \cdot {\boldsymbol \beta}_s)^3} \left(\mathbf{n} - \hat{{\boldsymbol \beta}}_s\right)(1-{\beta_s}^2)\end{align}</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{E} = q\ \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \left(\frac{v^2}{2c^2} - 3\frac{\left(\mathbf{\hat{r}} \cdot \mathbf{v}\right)^2}{2c^2} \right)</math>
-If <math>\mathbf{n}</math> is parallel to <math>{\boldsymbol \beta}_s</math>, then:
+Let's consider a '''''target charge''''' <math>Q</math> located at <math>\mathbf{r}</math> at rest in the observer's inertial frame. The inertial observer and the charge <math>q</math> agree on what the electric field <math>\mathbf{E}</math> is, they agree that there is no magnetic force on <math>Q</math>, and finally, they agree on the acceleration of <math>Q</math>.
-:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \frac{q_s}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|^2(1 - \beta_s)^3} \left(\mathbf{n} - {\boldsymbol \beta}_s\right)(1 - {\beta_s}^2)</math>
+Another way to express this result is in terms of the angle <math>\theta</math> between <math>\mathbf{v}</math> and <math>\mathbf{r}</math>:
-:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \frac{q_s}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|^2(1 - \beta_s)^3} \left(\mathbf{n} - {\boldsymbol \beta}_s\right)(1 - \beta_s)(1 + \beta_s)</math>
-:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \frac{q_s}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|^2(1 - \beta_s)^2} \left(\mathbf{n} - {\boldsymbol \beta}_s\right)(1 + \beta_s)</math>
-If in addition to the aforementioned condition, the condition <math>|{\boldsymbol \beta}_s| \ll |\mathbf{n}|</math> is also satisfied, then we can approximate <math>\mathbf{\hat{n}} - \hat{{\boldsymbol \beta}}_s</math> as <math>\mathbf{\hat{n}}</math>. This affects only the direction of the calculated electric field, not its magnitude. Regarding the instance of <math>\left(\mathbf{n} - {\boldsymbol \beta}_s\right)</math>, what we can do is factor out the magnitude <math>|\mathbf{n} - {\boldsymbol \beta}_s|</math> from the vector, and the use the approximation from the unit vector. Note, remember that <math>\mathbf{n}</math> and <math>{\boldsymbol \beta}_s</math> were taken to be co-linear. Therefore:
+:<math>\mathbf{E} = q\ \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{v^2}{2c^2} \left(1 - 3\ cos^2\theta \right)</math>
-:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \frac{q_s}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|^2(1 - \beta_s)^2} \mathbf{\hat{n}} \left(1 - \beta_s\right)(1 + \beta_s)</math>
+The above equation can be broken up into two parts, one based on the '''relative ''azimuthal'' velocity''' <math>\mathbf{v}_{\theta}</math> of the source, and one based on the '''relative ''radial'' velocity''' <math>\mathbf{v}_r</math> of the source. First we rearrange the equation:
-:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \frac{q_s}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|^2(1 - \beta_s)^2} \mathbf{\hat{n}} (1 + \beta_s)</math>
-:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \frac{q_s}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|^2} \frac{1 + \beta_s}{1 - \beta_s} \mathbf{\hat{n}}</math>
-Recognizing that the above condition limits the situation to non-relativistic velocities, that is to say <math>{\boldsymbol \beta} \ll 1</math> or <math>|\mathbf{v}_s| \ll c</math>, then we can approximate <math>1 - \beta_s</math> as <math>1</math> without significantly affecting the numerator <math>1 + \beta_s</math>. Therefore:
+:<math>\mathbf{E} = q\ \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \left(\frac{v^2 - \left(\mathbf{\hat{r}} \cdot \mathbf{v}\right)^2}{2c^2} - 2\frac{\left(\mathbf{\hat{r}} \cdot \mathbf{v}\right)^2}{2c^2} \right)</math>
-:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \frac{q_s}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1 + \beta_s}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|^2} \mathbf{\hat{n}}</math>
+Since the '''relative ''azimuthal'' velocity''' and the '''relative ''radial'' velocity''' are orthogonal, we can express the following:
-The "rigid" contribution to the electric field is:
+:<math>\mathbf{E} = q\ \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \left(\frac{v_{\theta}^2}{2c^2} - \frac{v_r^2}{c^2} \right)</math>
-:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t)_{rigid} = \frac{q_s}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|^2} \mathbf{\hat{n}}</math>
+The '''relative ''azimuthal'' velocity''' can be split into orthogonal components in <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> according to the following Pythagorean relation:
-If we consider an electromagnetic device composed of electrically neutral objects, what remains is a "quasistatic" contribution to the electric field.
+:<math>|\mathbf{v}_{\theta}|^2 = |\mathbf{v}_x|^2 + |\mathbf{v}_y|^2</math>
+:<math>v_{\theta}^2 = v_x^2 + v_y^2</math>
-:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t)_{quasistatic} = \frac{q_s}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{\beta_s}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|^2} \mathbf{\hat{n}}</math>
+Therefore:
-Given that:
+:<math>\mathbf{E} = q\ \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \left(\frac{v_x^2}{2c^2} + \frac{v_y^2}{2c^2} - \frac{v_r^2}{c^2} \right)</math>
-:<math>\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t) = \frac{\boldsymbol{\beta}_s(t_r)}{c} \varphi(\mathbf{r}, t)</math>
+The variables <math>v_x</math>, <math>v_y</math>, and <math>v_r</math> are mutually independent from each other. Therefore, the electric field <math>\mathbf{E}</math> can be split into three co-radial contributions:
-We can substitute for <math>\beta_s</math>:
+:<math>\mathbf{E}_x = + q\ \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{v_x^2}{2c^2}</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{E}_y = + q\ \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{v_y^2}{2c^2}</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{E}_r = - q\ \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{v_r^2}{c^2}</math>
-:<math>|\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)|c = \beta_s \varphi(\mathbf{r}, t)</math>
+Consider the existence of four charges:
-:<math>\beta_s = \frac{|\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)|c}{\varphi(\mathbf{r}, t)}</math>
-Because this scenario considers non-relativistic velocities, that is to say <math>{\boldsymbol \beta} \ll 1</math> or <math>|\mathbf{v}_s| \ll c</math>, we can again approximate the denominator. Therefore:
+:<math>q_-</math> : the negative charge of loose electrons of the source current element
+:<math>Q_-</math> : the negative charge of loose electrons of the target current element
+:<math>q_+</math> : the positive charge of metallic atoms (excluding loose electrons) of the source current element
+:<math>Q_+</math> : the positive charge of metallic atoms (excluding loose electrons) of the target current element
-:<math>\beta_s = \frac{|\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)|c}{\frac{q_s}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|}}</math>
+Consider the existence of their corresponding current elements:
-Therefore, substitution for <math>\beta_s</math> gives:
+:<math>id\mathbf{l}</math> : the source current element
+:<math>Id\mathbf{L}</math> : the target current element
-:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t)_{quasistatic} = \frac{q_s}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|^2} \frac{|\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)|c}{\frac{q_s}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|}} \mathbf{\hat{n}}</math>
+Where:
-:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t)_{quasistatic} = \frac{|\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)|c}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|} \mathbf{\hat{n}}</math>
+:<math>i</math> is the source current and <math>d\mathbf{l}</math> is its length element.
+:<math>I</math> is the target current and <math>d\mathbf{L}</math> is its length element.
-Next, substituting for <math>\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)</math> gives:
+The current elements are equal to:
-:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t)_{quasistatic} = \frac{\frac{\beta_s(t_r)}{c} \varphi(\mathbf{r}, t)c}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|} \mathbf{\hat{n}}</math>
+:<math>id\mathbf{l} = q_- \mathbf{v}_d</math>
+:<math>Id\mathbf{L} = Q_- \mathbf{V}_d</math>
-:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t)_{quasistatic} = -\beta_s(t_r) \nabla\varphi(\mathbf{r}, t)</math>
+Where:
-===Force is four-dimensional, not three dimensional===
+:<math>\mathbf{v}_d</math> is the drift velocity of the electrons of the source current element.
+:<math>\mathbf{V}_d</math> is the drift velocity of the electrons of the target current element.
-At the beginning of physics studies, students are normally treated to the famous equation <math>\mathbf{F} = m \mathbf{a}</math> where <math>\mathbf{F}</math> is the force, <math>m</math> is the mass, and <math>\mathbf{a}</math> is the acceleration. However, in special relativity, force is four-dimensional, because momentum is four-dimensional, and force is generally the rate change of momentum over time.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-force</ref> Even light itself is known to have momentum<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#Physical_properties</ref>.
+Say we want to calculate the force on the target current element due to the source current element. This requires us to analyze four different forces:
-There are three dimensions are associated with space, and one dimension is associated with time. Per Emmy Noether's theorem, momentum conservation is due to invariance due to spatial translations, while energy conservation is due to invariance due to time translations<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether's_theorem#Examples_2</ref>.
+:Force <math>\mathbf{F}_{--}</math> on <math>Q_-</math> by field <math>\mathbf{E}_{--}</math> of <math>q_-</math>
+:Force <math>\mathbf{F}_{+-}</math> on <math>Q_-</math> by field <math>\mathbf{E}_{+-}</math> of <math>q_+</math>
+:Force <math>\mathbf{F}_{-+}</math> on <math>Q_+</math> by field <math>\mathbf{E}_{-+}</math> of <math>q_-</math>
+:Force <math>\mathbf{F}_{++}</math> on <math>Q_+</math> by field <math>\mathbf{E}_{++}</math> of <math>q_+</math>
-It is known that the norm of the spatial-symmetry contribution of the four-momentum is frame dependent, while the norm of the entire four-momentum is itself invariant<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-momentum</ref>. This is a manifestation of the fact that a mass may radiate or absorb energy, and therefore the time-symmetry contribution of the four-momentum may change. The contribution to the four-force due to time-symmetry is essentially equal to velocity vector multiplied by power absorbed divided by the speed of light squared, which essentially gives velocity times the rate change of mass over time<ref>https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/force-on-a-spherically-uniform-radiator-moving-through-space.887479/</ref>.
+These four forces are dependent on four different relative velocities (source velocity w.r.t. target velocity):
-The Lorentz force gives us the rate change of the momentum per charge with respect to time. However, because the relationship between momentum <math>\mathbf{p}</math> and energy <math>\mathcal{E}</math> is<ref name="Akira Hirose">http://physics.usask.ca/~hirose/p812/notes/Ch10.pdf</ref>:
+:Relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{--} = \mathbf{v}_- - \mathbf{V}_-</math>
+:Relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{+-} = \mathbf{v}_+ - \mathbf{V}_-</math>
+:Relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{-+} = \mathbf{v}_- - \mathbf{V}_+</math>
+:Relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{++} = \mathbf{v}_+ - \mathbf{V}_+</math>
-:<math>\mathbf{p} = \frac{\mathbf{v}}{c^2}\mathcal{E}</math>
+The corresponding relative speeds are:
-The acceleration <math>\mathbf{a}</math> of a ''target point'' charge <math>q_t</math> due to the Lorentz force it receives is<ref name="Akira Hirose"/>:
+:Relative speed <math>v_{x--} = \left(v_- - V_-\right)_x</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{x+-} = \left(v_+ - V_-\right)_x</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{x-+} = \left(v_- - V_+\right)_x</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{x++} = \left(v_+ - V_+\right)_x</math>
-:<math>\mathbf{a} = \frac{q_t}{m\gamma}\left[\mathbf{E} + \boldsymbol{\beta}_t \times \mathbf{B} - \boldsymbol{\beta}_t \left(\boldsymbol{\beta}_t\ \dot\ \mathbf{E}\right)\right]</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{y--} = \left(v_- - V_-\right)_y</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{y+-} = \left(v_+ - V_-\right)_y</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{y-+} = \left(v_- - V_+\right)_y</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{y++} = \left(v_+ - V_+\right)_y</math>
-I ( ''[[User:S.H.O.|S.H.O.]] <sup>[[User_talk:S.H.O.|talk]]</sup>'') hereby make the suggestion that the first instance of <math>\mathbf{E}</math> is different than the second instance of <math>\mathbf{E}</math>. The first instance corresponds to the electric field according to the Lorentz-Maxwell model of the electric field. Under that model of the electric field, there is no effect on the longitudinal components of the electric field dependent on the chosen inertial frame. Therefore, as per the Joules-Bernoulli equation<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_electromagnetism_and_special_relativity#Transformation_of_the_fields_between_inertial_frames</ref> describing the transformation of the electric field between differing inertial frames, the following is true for the component of the electric field co-linear with the velocity:
+:Relative speed <math>v_{r--} = \left(v_- - V_-\right)_r</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{r+-} = \left(v_+ - V_-\right)_r</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{r-+} = \left(v_- - V_+\right)_r</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{r++} = \left(v_+ - V_+\right)_r</math>
-:<math>\mathbf {{E}_{\parallel}}' = \mathbf {{E}_{\parallel}}</math>
+The two drift velocities are:
-This is in contrast to the electric field model of Liénard–Wiechert, whose components co-linear with the velocity are dependent on the magnitude velocity, as is evident in the prior subsection titled "The Longitudinal E-field derived from the Liénard–Wiechert Potentials". I ( ''[[User:S.H.O.|S.H.O.]] <sup>[[User_talk:S.H.O.|talk]]</sup>'') am making a suggestion today (Wednesday March 15, 2017) that the second instance for the above ''Lorentz acceleration'' equation applies for the electric field as derived from the potentials of Alfred-Marie Liénard<ref>https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B817m31MAj0wZTZjZmMwMjgtY2Y5YS00YTq_s5LThjM2EtNzhjYTYzNzFlZDY0/edit?hl=en_GB&pli=1</ref> and Emil Wiechert<ref>https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B817m31MAj0wMDI1YjllYjctY2NhOS00M2M2LWFlMTUtYjVmYTkyZmVlY2M2/edit?hl=en_GB</ref>.
+:<math>\mathbf{v}_d = \mathbf{v}_- - \mathbf{v}_+</math> : The drift velocity of the loose electrons of the source current element
+:<math>\mathbf{V}_d = \mathbf{V}_- - \mathbf{V}_+</math> : The drift velocity of the loose electrons of the target current element
-To distinguish between these two electric fields, <math>\mathbf{E}_{LM}</math> will denote the electric field used in Lorentz force equation + Maxwell equations, while <math>\mathbf{E}_{LW}</math> will denote the electric fields as derived by the Liénard–Wiechert potentials. Therefore the acceleration <math>\mathbf{a}</math> becomes:
+Let the effective velocities of the current elements be:
-:<math>\mathbf{a} = \frac{q_t}{m\gamma}\left[\mathbf{E}_{LM} + \boldsymbol{\beta}_t \times \mathbf{B} - \boldsymbol{\beta}_t \left(\boldsymbol{\beta}_t\ \dot\ \mathbf{E}_{LW}\right)\right]</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{v} = \left( \mathbf{v}_- + \mathbf{v}_+ \right)/2</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{V} = \left( \mathbf{V}_- + \mathbf{V}_+ \right)/2</math>
-The extra acceleration term <math>\mathbf{a}_{LW}</math> is therefore:
+So the effective relative velocity between the current elements (source velocity w.r.t. target velocity) is:
-<math>\mathbf{a}_{LW} = - \boldsymbol{\beta}_t \left(\boldsymbol{\beta}_t\ \dot\ \mathbf{E}\right)</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{v}_{rel} = \mathbf{v} - \mathbf{V}</math>
-===Deriving an effective longitudinal force on a current element===
+The effective velocity of each current element is halfway between the velocity of the negative charges and the velocity of the positive charges, so one may rather define a new variable, the deviation velocity, to be one-half the drift velocity of the electrons:
-Per the section titled "The Longitudinal E-field derived from the Liénard–Wiechert Potentials" there is a "quasistatic" contribution to the electric field based upon the Liénard–Wiechert potentials.
+:<math>\mathbf{u} = \mathbf{v}_d / 2</math> is the deviation velocity of the source current element.
+:<math>\mathbf{U} = \mathbf{V}_d / 2</math> is the deviation velocity of the target current element.
-:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t)_{quasistatic} = \frac{|\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)|c}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|} \mathbf{\hat{n}}</math>
+All four relative velocities can be expressed in terms of the deviation velocities <math>\mathbf{u}</math> and <math>\mathbf{U}</math> together with the relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{rel}</math>.
-Then extra acceleration term <math>\mathbf{a}_{LW}</math> from the previous section titled "Force is four-dimensional, not three dimensional" becomes:
+:Relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{--} = \mathbf{v}_- - \mathbf{V}_- = \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v}_{rel} - \mathbf{U}</math>
+:Relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{+-} = \mathbf{v}_+ - \mathbf{V}_- = -\mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v}_{rel} - \mathbf{U}</math>
+:Relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{-+} = \mathbf{v}_- - \mathbf{V}_+ = \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v}_{rel} + \mathbf{U}</math>
+:Relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{++} = \mathbf{v}_+ - \mathbf{V}_+ = -\mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v}_{rel} + \mathbf{U}</math>
-:<math>\mathbf{a}_{LW} = - \frac{q_t}{m\gamma} \boldsymbol{\beta}_t \left(\boldsymbol{\beta}_t\ \dot\ \mathbf{\hat{n}} \frac{|\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)|c}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|} \right)</math>
+The corresponding relative speeds are:
-Because this scenario considers non-relativistic velocities, that is to say <math>{\boldsymbol \beta} \ll 1</math> or <math>|\mathbf{v}_s| \ll c</math>, we can approximate the Lorentz factor <math>\gamma</math> as <math>1</math>. Therefore:
+:Relative speed <math>v_{x--} = \left(v_- - V_- = u + v_{rel} - U\right)_x</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{x+-} = \left(v_+ - V_- = -u + v_{rel} - U\right)_x</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{x-+} = \left(v_- - V_+ = u + v_{rel} + U\right)_x</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{x++} = \left(v_+ - V_+ = -u + v_{rel} + U\right)_x</math>
-:<math>\mathbf{a}_{LW} = - \frac{q_t}{m} \boldsymbol{\beta}_t \left(\boldsymbol{\beta}_t\ \dot\ \mathbf{\hat{n}} \frac{|\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)|c}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_s|} \right)</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{y--} = \left(v_- - V_- = u + v_{rel} - U\right)_y</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{y+-} = \left(v_+ - V_- = -u + v_{rel} - U\right)_y</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{y-+} = \left(v_- - V_+ = u + v_{rel} + U\right)_y</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{y++} = \left(v_+ - V_+ = -u + v_{rel} + U\right)_y</math>
-If acceleration <math>\dot{\boldsymbol \beta}_s</math> of the ''source point'' charge <math>q_s</math> at position <math>\mathbf{r}_s</math> is negligible, then:
+:Relative speed <math>v_{r--} = \left(v_- - V_- = u + v_{rel} - U\right)_r</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{r+-} = \left(v_+ - V_- = -u + v_{rel} - U\right)_r</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{r-+} = \left(v_- - V_+ = u + v_{rel} + U\right)_r</math>
+:Relative speed <math>v_{r++} = \left(v_+ - V_+ = -u + v_{rel} + U\right)_r</math>
-:<math>\mathbf{a}_{LW} = - \frac{q_t}{m} \boldsymbol{\beta}_t \left(\boldsymbol{\beta}_t\ \dot\ \nabla\right) \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)c</math>
+The equation for the electric field contains squared values of the speed. As noted before:
-:<math>\mathbf{a}_{LW} = - \frac{q_t}{m} \boldsymbol{\beta}_t \left(\frac{\mathbf{v}_t}{c} \dot\ \nabla\right) \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)c</math>
-:<math>\mathbf{a}_{LW} = - \frac{q_t}{m} \boldsymbol{\beta}_t \left(\mathbf{v}_t \dot\ \nabla\right) \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)</math>
-The ''effective'' longitudinal force on charge <math>+q</math> of velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{+q}</math> is:
+:<math>\mathbf{E} = q\ \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \left(\frac{v^2 - \left(\mathbf{\hat{r}} \cdot \mathbf{v}\right)^2}{2c^2} - 2\frac{\left(\mathbf{\hat{r}} \cdot \mathbf{v}\right)^2}{2c^2} \right)</math>
-:<math>\mathbf{F_{+q}}_{LW} = - (+q) \boldsymbol{\beta}_{+q} \left(\mathbf{v}_{+q} \dot\ \nabla\right) \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)</math>
+The electric fields on charges <math>Q_+</math> and <math>Q_-</math>, in their own respective and distinct rest frames, are as follows:
-Likewise, the ''effective'' longitudinal force on charge <math>-q</math> of velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{-q}</math> is:
+:<math>\mathbf{E}_- = \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{2c^2} \left( q_- \left(v_{x--}^2 + v_{y--}^2 - 2 v_{r--}^2\right) + q_+ \left(v_{x+-}^2 + v_{y+-}^2 - 2 v_{r+-}^2\right) \right)</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{E}_+ = \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{2c^2} \left( q_- \left(v_{x-+}^2 + v_{y-+}^2 - 2 v_{r-+}^2\right) + q_+ \left(v_{x++}^2 + v_{y++}^2 - 2 v_{r++}^2\right) \right)</math>
-:<math>\mathbf{F_{-q}}_{LW} = - (-q) \boldsymbol{\beta}_{-q} \left(\mathbf{v}_{-q} \dot\ \nabla\right) \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)</math>
+===The Forces due to the Liénard–Wiechert electric fields for electrically-neutral currents===
-Per the above results, the effective longitudinal force is proportional to the square of the velocity of the charge <math>q</math>. In the case where <math>\mathbf{v}_{-q} > \mathbf{v}_{+q}</math> The total force on a pair of equal and opposite charges <math>+q</math> and <math>-q</math> is varies as:
+It may be more helpful to calculate the forces due to relative radial velocities separately from the forces due to relative azimuthal velocities. Therefore:
-<math>\mathbf{F_{-q}}_{LW} \propto v_{-q}^2 - v_{+q}^2</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_x = \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{2c^2} \left( Q_- q_- v_{x--}^2 + Q_- q_+ v_{x+-}^2 + Q_+ q_- v_{x-+}^2 + Q_+ q_+ v_{x++}^2 \right)</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_y = \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{2c^2} \left( Q_- q_- v_{y--}^2 + Q_- q_+ v_{y+-}^2 + Q_+ q_- v_{y-+}^2 + Q_+ q_+ v_{y++}^2 \right)</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_r = \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{- 2}{2c^2} \left( Q_- q_- v_{r--}^2 + Q_- q_+ v_{r+-}^2 + Q_+ q_- v_{r-+}^2 + Q_+ q_+ v_{r++}^2 \right)</math>
-<math>\mathbf{F_{-q}}_{LW} \propto (v_{avg}+v_{dev})^2 - (v_{avg}-v_{dev})^2</math>
+It follows that <math>\mathbf{F}_x</math> and <math>\mathbf{F}_y</math> are functions of currents perpendicular to radial vector <math>\mathbf{r}</math> while <math>\mathbf{F}_r</math> is a function of currents co-linear with radial vector <math>\mathbf{r}</math>
-<math>\mathbf{F_{-q}}_{LW} \propto v_{avg} v_{dev}</math>
+All charges (<math>Q_-</math>, <math>Q_+</math>, <math>q_-</math>, and <math>q_+</math>) may contribute simultaneously to the azimuthally-directed ('''transverse''') currents in <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> and the radially-directed ('''longitudinal''') currents in <math>r</math>.
-Where:
+It will be very advantageous to simplify these formulas. For electrically-neutral currents, we can recognize the following:
-* <math>v_{avg}</math> represents the "center of velocity" of the current element, considering both positive and negative charges.
+:<math>q_+ = - q_-</math>
-* <math>v_{dev}</math> is represents one-half of the drift velocity of the negative charges relative to the positive charges.
+:<math>Q_+ = - Q_-</math>
-This result is consistent with the results of the Marinov Generator experiment conducted by Cyril W. Smith (See figure 9 of <ref name="Marinov Generator"/>). Sincerely,  ''[[User:S.H.O.|S.H.O.]] <sup>[[User_talk:S.H.O.|talk]]</sup>'' 23:41, 15 March 2017 (PDT)
+This allows us to factor out <math>Q_+ q_+</math> with the following result:
-To finalize the above results, let's consider the specific weighted average squared velocity:
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_x = \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{2c^2} \left( v_{x--}^2 - v_{x+-}^2 - v_{x-+}^2 + v_{x++}^2 \right)</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_y = \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{2c^2} \left( v_{y--}^2 - v_{y+-}^2 - v_{y-+}^2 + v_{y++}^2 \right)</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_r = \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{- 2}{2c^2} \left( v_{r--}^2 - v_{r+-}^2 - v_{r-+}^2 + v_{r++}^2 \right)</math>
-<math>v_{weighted}^2 = (50%) v_{-q}^2 - (50%) v_{+q}^2</math>
+Next, we will work on simplifying the contents within the parentheses. To make matters simpler, we will move the subscript to the lower right corner of the parentheses.
-<math>v_{weighted}^2 = (1/2) v_{-q}^2 - (1/2) v_{+q}^2</math>
-In terms of <math>v_{avg}</math> and <math>v_{dev}</math>, the result is:
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_x = \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{2c^2} \left( v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 - v_{-+}^2 + v_{++}^2 \right)_x</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_y = \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{2c^2} \left( v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 - v_{-+}^2 + v_{++}^2 \right)_y</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_r = \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{- 2}{2c^2} \left( v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 - v_{-+}^2 + v_{++}^2 \right)_r</math>
-<math>v_{weighted}^2 = (1/2) (v_{avg}+v_{dev})^2 - (1/2) (v_{avg}-v_{dev})^2</math>
+These can be distributed back to the contents within the parentheses after they are substituted for a different expression in terms of the currents. The terms in the parentheses (disregarding their sign) are as follows:
-<math>v_{weighted}^2 = 2 v_{avg}v_{dev}</math>
-Since the deviation velocity <math>v_{dev}</math> is one-half the drift velocity, let <math>v_{drift}</math> be the drift velocity. In the case that the drift velocity is co-linear with average velocity, the force on a current element <math>I</math> due to the aforementioned longitudinal force is:
+:<math>v_{--}^2 = \left(u + v_{rel} - U\right)^2 = u^2 + v_{rel}^2 + U^2 + (2u - 2U) v_{rel} - 2 u U</math>
+:<math>v_{+-}^2 = \left(-u + v_{rel} - U\right)^2 = u^2 + v_{rel}^2 + U^2 + (-2u - 2U) v_{rel} + 2 u U</math>
+:<math>v_{-+}^2 = \left(u + v_{rel} + U\right)^2 = u^2 + v_{rel}^2 + U^2 + (2u + 2U) v_{rel} + 2 u U</math>
+:<math>v_{++}^2 = \left(-u + v_{rel} + U\right)^2 = u^2 + v_{rel}^2 + U^2 + (-2u + 2U) v_{rel} - 2 u U</math>
-:<math>\mathbf{F}_{LW} = - (-q) \boldsymbol{\beta}_{avg} \left(\mathbf{v}_{drift} \dot\ \nabla\right) \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)</math>
+Therefore sum of the forces on <math>Q_-</math> and <math>Q_+</math> depends on:
-In the case of the Marinov Generator, as the conductive slip ring increases speed, the charge carriers conveying the current are thinned out due to the sliding motion of the contacts, and so their quantity per length varies inversely to the speed. The drift velocity is determined by the voltage applied to the slip ring divided by the slip ring resistance and is not a function of externally driven shaft's rotational rate. As a result, the induced voltage increase directly with the increase of the velocity of the slip ring <math>v_{+q}</math> and therefore <math>\boldsymbol{\beta}_{+q}</math>. Note comparatively minute drift velocities of the current-carrying loose electrons <math>-q</math> against the remaining charge of the slip ring <math>+q</math>.
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 - v_{-+}^2 + v_{++}^2 = ((2u - 2U) - (-2u - 2U) - (2u + 2U) + (-2u + 2U))v_{rel} + ((-2) - (2) - (2) + (-2)) u U</math>
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 - v_{-+}^2 + v_{++}^2 = ((2u - 2U) + (2u + 2U) - (2u + 2U) - (2u - 2U))v_{rel} - 8 u U</math>
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 - v_{-+}^2 - v_{+-}^2 + v_{++}^2 = ((-2U) + (2U) - (2U) - (- 2U))v_{rel} - 8 u U</math>
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 - v_{-+}^2 + v_{++}^2 = (0)v_{rel} - 8 u U</math>
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 - v_{-+}^2 + v_{++}^2 = - 8 u U</math>
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 - v_{-+}^2 + v_{++}^2 = - 8 (v_d/2)(V_d/2)</math>
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 - v_{-+}^2 + v_{++}^2 = - 2 (v_d)(V_d)</math>
-This further confirms the above prior results.
+The force on <math>Q_-</math> depends on:
-I am more certain now than before that the M.A.K.E.R.A.R.C will work. Sincerely,  ''[[User:S.H.O.|S.H.O.]] <sup>[[User_talk:S.H.O.|talk]]</sup>'' 00:29, 16 March 2017 (PDT)
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 = ((2u - 2U) - (-2u - 2U))v_{rel} + ((-2) - (2)) u U</math>
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 = 4 u v_{rel} - 4 u U</math>
+The force on <math>Q_+</math> depends on:
+:<math>v_{++}^2 - v_{-+}^2 = ((-2u + 2U) - (2u + 2U))v_{rel} + (- (2) + (-2)) u U</math>
+:<math>v_{++}^2 - v_{-+}^2 = -4 u v_{rel} - 4 u U</math>
+Recalling that:
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_x = \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{2c^2} \left( v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 - v_{-+}^2 + v_{++}^2 \right)_x</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_y = \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{2c^2} \left( v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 - v_{-+}^2 + v_{++}^2 \right)_y</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_r = \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{- 2}{2c^2} \left( v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 - v_{-+}^2 + v_{++}^2 \right)_r</math>
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 - v_{-+}^2 + v_{++}^2 = - 2 (v_d)(V_d)</math>
+Substitution yields:
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_x = \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{2c^2} \left( - 2 (v_d)(V_d) \right)_x</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_y = \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{2c^2} \left( - 2 (v_d)(V_d) \right)_y</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_r = \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{- 2}{2c^2} \left( - 2 (v_d)(V_d) \right)_r</math>
+Simplified:
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_x = - \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( (v_d)(V_d) \right)_x</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_y = - \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( (v_d)(V_d) \right)_y</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_r = + \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{2}{c^2} \left( (v_d)(V_d) \right)_r</math>
+As stated earlier, the current elements are equal to:
+:<math>id\mathbf{l} = q_- \mathbf{v}_d</math>
+:<math>Id\mathbf{L} = Q_- \mathbf{V}_d</math>
+We can now substitute the currents into the equation. First we substitute <math>Q_- q_-</math> for <math>Q_+ q_+</math>:
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_x = - \frac{Q_- q_- \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( (v_d)(V_d) \right)_x</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_y = - \frac{Q_- q_- \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( (v_d)(V_d) \right)_y</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_r = + \frac{Q_- q_- \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{2}{c^2} \left( (v_d)(V_d) \right)_r</math>
+Next, we assign each charge with their corresponding drift velocities:
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_x = - \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( (Q_- V_d) (q_- v_d) \right)_x</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_y = - \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( (Q_- V_d) (q_- v_d) \right)_y</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_r = + \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{2}{c^2} \left( (Q_- V_d) (q_- v_d) \right)_r</math>
+Next, we make a substitution for the current elements:
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_x = - \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( (Id\mathbf{L}) \cdot (id\mathbf{l}) \right)_x</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_y = - \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( (Id\mathbf{L}) \cdot (id\mathbf{l}) \right)_y</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_r = + \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{2}{c^2} \left( (Id\mathbf{L}) \cdot (id\mathbf{l}) \right)_r</math>
+This can be written as:
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_x = - \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( Ii (d\mathbf{L} \cdot d\mathbf{l}) \right)_x</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_y = - \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( Ii (d\mathbf{L} \cdot d\mathbf{l}) \right)_y</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_r = + \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{2}{c^2} \left( Ii (d\mathbf{L} \cdot d\mathbf{l}) \right)_r</math>
+Or:
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_x = - \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{Ii}{c^2} \left( d\mathbf{L} \cdot d\mathbf{l} \right)_x</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_y = - \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{Ii}{c^2} \left( d\mathbf{L} \cdot d\mathbf{l} \right)_y</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_r = + \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{2Ii}{c^2} \left( d\mathbf{L} \cdot d\mathbf{l} \right)_r</math>
+Or:
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_x = - \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{Ii}{c^2} \left( d\mathbf{L}_x \cdot d\mathbf{l}_x \right)</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_y = - \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{Ii}{c^2} \left( d\mathbf{L}_y \cdot d\mathbf{l}_y \right)</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_r = + \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{2Ii}{c^2} \left( d\mathbf{L}_r \cdot d\mathbf{l}_r \right)</math>
+Adding the forces together, their sum is:
+:<math>\mathbf{F} = \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{Ii}{c^2} \left( 2 d\mathbf{L}_r \cdot d\mathbf{l}_r - d\mathbf{L}_x \cdot d\mathbf{l}_x - d\mathbf{L}_y \cdot d\mathbf{l}_y \right)</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F} = \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{Ii}{c^2} \left( 2 d\mathbf{L}_r \cdot d\mathbf{l}_r - d\mathbf{L}_\theta \cdot d\mathbf{l}_\theta \right)</math>
+In S.I. Units:
+:<math>\mathbf{F} = \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^2} \frac{Ii}{c^2} \left( 2 d\mathbf{L}_r \cdot d\mathbf{l}_r - d\mathbf{L}_\theta \cdot d\mathbf{l}_\theta \right)</math>
+Or:
+:<math>\mathbf{F} = \frac{\mu_0 I i \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{4\pi r^2} \left( 2 d\mathbf{L}_r \cdot d\mathbf{l}_r - d\mathbf{L}_\theta \cdot d\mathbf{l}_\theta \right)</math>
+The second differential is:
+:<math>d^2\mathbf{F} = \frac{\mu_0 \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{4\pi r^2} \left( 2 \mathbf{I}_r \cdot \mathbf{i}_r - \mathbf{I}_\theta \cdot \mathbf{i}_\theta \right)</math>
+===Special Scenario: No relative motion between positive charges===
+In the case that the positive charges <math>q_+</math> and <math>Q_+</math> are essentially stationary, '''we can simplify the derivation of the field and force equations in the rest frame of the positive charges'''.
+As stated in the parent section, the two drift velocities are:
+:<math>\mathbf{v}_d = \mathbf{v}_- - \mathbf{v}_+</math> : The drift velocity of the loose electrons of the source current element
+:<math>\mathbf{V}_d = \mathbf{V}_- - \mathbf{V}_+</math> : The drift velocity of the loose electrons of the target current element
+These become:
+:<math>\mathbf{v}_d = \mathbf{v}_-</math> : The drift velocity of the loose electrons of the source current element
+:<math>\mathbf{V}_d = \mathbf{V}_-</math> : The drift velocity of the loose electrons of the target current element
+As stated in the parent section, the effective velocities of the current elements are:
+:<math>\mathbf{v} = \left( \mathbf{v}_- + \mathbf{v}_+ \right)/2</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{V} = \left( \mathbf{V}_- + \mathbf{V}_+ \right)/2</math>
+These become:
+:<math>\mathbf{v} = \mathbf{v}_-  /2</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{V} = \mathbf{V}_- / 2</math>
+As stated in the parent section, a new variable, the deviation velocity, is defined as one-half the drift velocity of the electrons:
+:<math>\mathbf{u} = \mathbf{v}_d / 2</math> is the deviation velocity of the source current element.
+:<math>\mathbf{U} = \mathbf{V}_d / 2</math> is the deviation velocity of the target current element.
+Therefore:
+:<math>\mathbf{v} = \mathbf{u} </math>
+:<math>\mathbf{V} = \mathbf{U} </math>
+The effective relative velocity between the current elements (source velocity w.r.t. target velocity) is:
+:<math>\mathbf{v}_{rel} = \mathbf{v} - \mathbf{V}</math>
+Therefore:
+:<math>\mathbf{v}_{rel} = \mathbf{u} - \mathbf{U}</math>
+As derived in the parent section, all four relative velocities can be expressed in terms of the deviation velocities <math>\mathbf{u}</math> and <math>\mathbf{U}</math> together with the relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{rel}</math>.
+:Relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{--} = \mathbf{v}_- - \mathbf{V}_- = \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v}_{rel} - \mathbf{U}</math>
+:Relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{-+} = \mathbf{v}_- - \mathbf{V}_+ = \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v}_{rel} + \mathbf{U}</math>
+:Relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{+-} = \mathbf{v}_+ - \mathbf{V}_- = -\mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v}_{rel} - \mathbf{U}</math>
+:Relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{++} = \mathbf{v}_+ - \mathbf{V}_+ = -\mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v}_{rel} + \mathbf{U}</math>
+By substituting for <math>\mathbf{v}_{rel}</math>, we get:
+:Relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{--} = \mathbf{v}_- - \mathbf{V}_- = 2\mathbf{u} - 2\mathbf{U}</math>
+:Relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{-+} = \mathbf{v}_- - \mathbf{V}_+ = 2\mathbf{u}</math>
+:Relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{+-} = \mathbf{v}_+ - \mathbf{V}_- = -2\mathbf{U}</math>
+:Relative velocity <math>\mathbf{v}_{++} = \mathbf{v}_+ - \mathbf{V}_+ = 0</math>
+As derived in the parent section, the following is a series sum of terms (a function of relative speeds) which will be used to help calculate the forces between currents:
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{-+}^2 - v_{+-}^2 + v_{++}^2</math>
+Based on the above results, we have:
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{-+}^2 - v_{+-}^2 + v_{++}^2 = (2u - 2U)^2 - (2u)^2 - (-2U)^2 + 0</math>
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{-+}^2 - v_{+-}^2 + v_{++}^2 = (4u^2 + 4U^2 - 8uU) - 4u^2 - 4U^2 + 0</math>
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{-+}^2 - v_{+-}^2 + v_{++}^2 = - 8uU</math>
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{-+}^2 - v_{+-}^2 + v_{++}^2 = - 8 (v_{d}/2)(V_{d}/2)</math>
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{-+}^2 - v_{+-}^2 + v_{++}^2 =  -2 (v_{d})(V_{d})</math>
+This produces the same results as the parent section titled "Explaining the Marinov Motor and Cyril Smith's 'Marinov Generator' using Conventional Physics" and the previous section titled "The Forces due to the Liénard–Wiechert electric fields for electrically-neutral currents":
+In S.I. Units:
+:<math>\mathbf{F} = \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^2} \frac{Ii}{c^2} \left( 2 d\mathbf{L}_r \cdot d\mathbf{l}_r - d\mathbf{L}_\theta \cdot d\mathbf{l}_\theta \right)</math>
+Or:
+:<math>\mathbf{F} = \frac{\mu_0 I i \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{4\pi r^2} \left( 2 d\mathbf{L}_r \cdot d\mathbf{l}_r - d\mathbf{L}_\theta \cdot d\mathbf{l}_\theta \right)</math>
+The second differential is:
+:<math>d^2\mathbf{F} = \frac{\mu_0 \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{4\pi r^2} \left( 2 \mathbf{I}_r \cdot \mathbf{i}_r - \mathbf{I}_\theta \cdot \mathbf{i}_\theta \right)</math>
+===Deriving James Wesley's additional force term in the case of co-linear current elements===
+As pointed out above in the sub-section titled "James Wesley's proposal", James Wesley proposed adding the "motional induction" on charge <math>q</math>. In SI Units, this can be expressed as:<ref name="Marinov Motor"/>
+: <math>-q(\mathbf{v}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{A}</math>
+How may we derive the same result for current elements located and oriented along the same line? Equation 2b of the paper titled "Observations of the Marinov Motor"<ref name="Marinov Motor"/> can be adapted to the form above, resulting in:
+: <math>\mathbf{F} = -Q_- \left(\mathbf{V}_d \cdot \nabla \right) \mathbf{A} = Q_- \left(-\mathbf{V}_d \cdot \nabla \right) \mathbf{A} = - I \left( d\mathbf{L} \cdot \nabla \right) \mathbf{A} </math>
+In the case that we are dealing only with co-linear current elements, the result can be expressed as:
+: <math>\mathbf{F}_r = \left( -Q_- \left(\mathbf{V}_d \cdot \nabla \right) \mathbf{A} = Q_- \left(-\mathbf{V}_d \cdot \nabla \right) \mathbf{A} = - I \left( d\mathbf{L} \cdot \nabla \right) \mathbf{A} \right)_r</math>
+As stated in the parent section, the force on <math>Q_-</math> depends on:
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 = ((2u - 2U) - (-2u - 2U))v_{rel} + ((-2) - (2)) u U</math>
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 = 4 u v_{rel} - 4 u U</math>
+As stated in the parent section, The force on <math>Q_+</math> depends on:
+:<math>v_{++}^2 - v_{-+}^2 = ((-2u + 2U) - (2u + 2U))v_{rel} + (- (2) + (-2)) u U</math>
+:<math>v_{++}^2 - v_{-+}^2 = -4 u v_{rel} - 4 u U</math>
+In the case that that there is no relative velocity <math>v_{rel}</math> between the current elements:
+:<math>v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2 = - 4 u U = -4 (v_d/2)(V_d/2) = - (v_d)(V_d)</math>
+:<math>v_{++}^2 - v_{-+}^2 = - 4 u U = -4 (v_d/2)(V_d/2) = - (v_d)(V_d)</math>
+As stated in the section "The Forces due to the Liénard–Wiechert electric fields for electrically-neutral currents", the electric forces on charges <math>Q_-</math> and <math>Q_+</math> are:
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_{r-} = + \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( v_{--}^2 - v_{+-}^2  \right)_r</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_{r+} = + \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( v_{++}^2 - v_{-+}^2  \right)_r</math>
+From this and above, it follows that:
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_{r-} = + \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( - (v_d)(V_d)  \right)_r</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_{r+} = + \frac{Q_+ q_+ \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( - (v_d)(V_d)  \right)_r</math>
+Therefore:
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_{r-} = + \frac{Q_- q_- \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( - (v_d)(V_d) \right)_r</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_{r+} = + \frac{Q_+ q_- \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( + (v_d)(V_d) \right)_r</math>
+The effective electric fields experience by each charge is:
+:<math>\mathbf{E}_{r-} = + \frac{q_- \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( - (v_d)(V_d) \right)_r</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{E}_{r+} = + \frac{q_- \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2} \frac{1}{c^2} \left( + (v_d)(V_d) \right)_r</math>
+Given that:
+:<math>Q_+ = - Q_-</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{U} = \mathbf{v}_d / 2</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{v}_d = \mathbf{U} - (-\mathbf{U})</math>
+:<math>Id\mathbf{L} = Q_- \mathbf{V}_d = Q_- (+ \mathbf{U}) + Q_+ (-\mathbf{U})</math>
+It can be shown that:
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_{r+} = \left( - Q_+ \left((-\mathbf{U}) \cdot \nabla \right) \mathbf{A} \right)_r</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_{r-} = \left( - Q_- \left((+\mathbf{U}) \cdot \nabla \right) \mathbf{A} \right)_r</math>
+:<math>\mathbf{F}_r = \left( - Q_- \left(\mathbf{V}_d \cdot \nabla \right) \mathbf{A} \right)_r = \mathbf{F}_{r-} + \mathbf{F}_{r+}</math>
+This is based on the directional derivative of vector potential <math>\mathbf{A}</math> along <math>Id\mathbf{L}</math>.
+It is important to note that the total force <math>\mathbf{F}_r</math> in <math>r</math> remains unaffected by the relative motion between the target current element <math>I_rd\mathbf{L}_r</math> and the source current element <math>i_rd\mathbf{l}_r</math> responsible for vector potential <math>\mathbf{A}_r</math>. However, forces <math>\mathbf{F}_{r-}</math> and <math>\mathbf{F}_{r+}</math> are affected by the relative speed <math>(v_{rel})_r</math> between the current elements in <math>r</math>, which leads to a kind of electromagnetic induction acting between co-linear current elements in relative motion in <math>r</math>. This feature may help to explain Cyril Smith's "Marinov Generator"<ref name="Marinov Generator"/>.
 ==A New Idea: The Makerarc==
-The above result supports a development beyond the S.H.O. Drive. A much more powerful and compact permanent magnet system is now envisioned, the viability of which rests on the condition that <math>\langle \nabla \varphi' \rangle = 0</math> on each charge <math>q</math>. The preliminary name is Makerarc (MAY-KERR-ARK), which stands for:
+The above result supports a development beyond the S.H.O. Drive. A much more powerful and compact permanent magnet system is now envisioned.
+The preliminary name is Makerarc (MAY-KERR-ARK), which stands for:
 * '''M'''agnetic
@@ Line 284: / Line 566: @@
 Details pending. Stay tuned. Sincerely,  ''[[User:S.H.O.|S.H.O.]] <sup>[[User_talk:S.H.O.|talk]]</sup>'' 22:09, 5 March 2017 (PST)
-==Explaining "Altered-Lenz" Devices==
+What makes a magnet tick? Clues can be found in the video titled "MAGNETS: How Do They Work?" by Veritasium<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFAOXdXZ5TM</ref>. ''[[User:S.H.O.|S.H.O.]] <sup>[[User_talk:S.H.O.|talk]]</sup>'' 22:08, 23 March 2017 (PDT)
-It is anticipated that the longitudinal force described in the previous section may explain some types of Reduced-Lenz devices. A good example can be found in the video below ("Ray's No Back EMF Generator"), although in this example, the longitudinal force ''increases'' the drag, mainly in positions where pancake generator coil mostly outside the cylindrical boundary of the permanent magnet:
+<youtube>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFAOXdXZ5TM</youtube>
+An attempt to produce the Makerarc back in March 2017<ref>https://www.facebook.com/Sho.Drives/videos/790278744462849/</ref> failed to demonstrate the predictions of the term <math>\mathbf{F}_r = \left( - Q_- \left(\mathbf{V}_d \cdot \nabla \right) \mathbf{A} \right)_r</math><ref>https://www.facebook.com/Sho.Drives/videos/791514291005961/</ref> where I assumed that an external vector potential <math>\mathbf{A}</math> would lead to a force co-linear to current elements. This may be due to the supercurrent nature of electrons bounded to atoms, allowing atoms to be capable of preserving or "fixing" the amount of magnetic flux that passes through them, just as "macroscopic" superconducting currents do for superconductors, and therefore, by extension be capable of resisting changes in the magnetic vector potential. This does not negate the possibility of a Marinov Generator, as designed by Cyril Smith, because in his case the currents receiving power were inside a conductor where an externally applied vector potential is not fully shielded against, permitting <math>\mathbf{F}_r = \left( - Q_- \left(\mathbf{V}_d \cdot \nabla \right) \mathbf{A} \right)_r</math> to yield a force. At the moment, I am still trying to decide on the correct model, but hopefully the surviving concept is similar to what I have developed so far in this page. Sincerely,  ''[[User:S.H.O.|S.H.O.]] <sup>[[User_talk:S.H.O.|talk]]</sup>'' 19:55, 14 July 2017 (PDT)
+==Explaining "Altered" Lenz' Law Devices==
+It is anticipated that the longitudinal force described above in the section titled "Explaining the Marinov Motor and Cyril Smith's 'Marinov Generator' using Conventional Physics" may explain some types of purported Reduced-Lenz devices. A good example can be found in the video below ("Ray's No Back EMF Generator"), although in this example, the longitudinal force ''increases'' the drag, mainly in positions where pancake generator coil is mostly outside the cylindrical boundary of the permanent magnet. This creates an illusion of a "Reduced" Lenz' Law effect when the magnet is mostly within the cylindrical boundary of the permanent magnet:
 <youtube>x3TFALmHtMw</youtube>
-Simulations in JavaScript and THREE.js have determined that in many cases the magnetic Lorentz force <math>q\ \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}</math> will be opposed in part by the additional force. This makes certain types of magnetic circuit arrangements more efficient at electrical power generation (in terms of output power vs. input power) but less efficient as an electrical motor. Simulations of the S.H.O. Drive indicated that the additional force may vary between assisting or opposing the magnetic Lorentz force, which is helpful depending on whether the goal is to develop an efficient motor or an efficient generator, respectively. The simulated S.H.O. Drive designs appeared to switch between these two extremes every quarter cycle. The only way to make it work would have been to increase the inductive reactance (so that the current would be delayed by about a quarter cycle), and even then, simulations indicated that the extra term was typically insufficient to completely reverse the net force. However simulations of various rotor and S.H.O. coil curve modifications for the S.H.O. Drive showed that it was possible for the additional force to be a significant percentage of the magnetic Lorentz force. Per more recent simulations (early March), the Makerarc design (previous section) will improve upon this many fold. ''[[User:S.H.O.|S.H.O.]] <sup>[[User_talk:S.H.O.|talk]]</sup>'' 23:39, 5 March 2017 (PST)
+Simulations in JavaScript and THREE.js have determined that in many other configurations of currents and magnets, the magnetic Lorentz forces <math>q\ \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}</math> will be ''opposed'' in part by the additional force. This makes certain types of magnetic circuit arrangements more efficient at electrical power generation (in terms of output power vs. input power) but less efficient as an electrical motor. Simulations of the S.H.O. Drive indicated that the additional force may vary between assisting or opposing the magnetic Lorentz force, which is helpful depending on whether the goal is to develop an efficient motor or an efficient generator, respectively. The simulated S.H.O. Drive designs appeared to switch between these two extremes every quarter cycle. The only way to make it work would have been to increase the inductive reactance (so that the current would be delayed by about a quarter cycle), and even then, simulations indicated that the extra term was typically insufficient to completely reverse the net force. However simulations of various rotor and S.H.O. coil curve modifications for the S.H.O. Drive showed that it was possible for the additional force to be a significant percentage of the magnetic Lorentz force. Per more recent simulations (early March), the Makerarc design (previous section) will improve upon this many fold. ''[[User:S.H.O.|S.H.O.]] <sup>[[User_talk:S.H.O.|talk]]</sup>'' 23:39, 5 March 2017 (PST)
 ==Explaining the Newman Motor==
+{{See also|Memory Lane}}
 A Newman Motor-style coil and magnet arrangement, like that shown in the video below, have been simulated by me using JavaScript and THREE.js.